■ Este hilo se encuentra guardado en el archivo
Human Rights in your country (66 respuestas)
1 :
Nameless@Passing through the lobby [BG] (78.90.*.*)
: 21/06/16(tue)11:49:15
ID:Eus4ocWq0
How are the human rights in your country? Do you have freedom of speech, freedom of the press, property rights?
My country we do not have freedom of the press or speech. If they found that I posted here criticizing them, they would declare everyone in my IP range to be enemy of the state. We do not have much property rights either, as if you retaliate against an intruder, you are liable to being sued for damages against him.
2 :
Nameless@Passing through the lobby [GB] (*.arubacloud.com)
: 21/06/16(tue)19:44:05
ID:QzyaCaOA0
Cool story.
3 :
Nameless@Passing through the lobby [CL] (*.movistar.cl)
: 21/06/16(tue)19:47:27
ID:g5DXAop50
We aren't as fucked as the US or UK that's for sure. There isn't a lot of problem with freedom of *speech* specifically here but the police is still fucked up when dealing with people.
4 :
Nameless@Passing through the lobby [US] (*.comcast.net)
: 22/06/16(wed)00:08:27
ID:XyC2NnGg0
>Do you have freedom of speech, freedom of the press, property rights?
All of the above. However when it comes to being able to defend your property it depends on the state. Many states in the Midwest and South have the Castle Doctrine where you can defend yourself against trespassers without any repercussions but the Northeast and the West Coast do not have these laws.
>We aren't as fucked as the US or UK that's for sure
Please don't lump us in with the British, we actually have freedoms over here
>Many states in the Midwest and South have the Castle Doctrine where you can defend yourself against trespassers without any repercussions
Sounds like an excuse to be literally trigger-happy.
6 :
Nameless@Passing through the lobby [CL] (*.movistar.cl)
: 22/06/16(wed)01:44:36
ID:YRCGcnEI0
>>4lol but how is that government surveillance going
and your police doesn't seem to.... friendly either to say the least
Yeah, just because there aren't security cameras around every corner doesn't mean the US don't have a serious surveillance problem.
8 :
Nameless@Passing through the lobby [CL] (*.movistar.cl)
: 22/06/16(wed)01:55:39
ID:4BIVu78A0
Property is not a right.
9 :
Nameless@Passing through the lobby [BG] (78.90.*.*)
: 22/06/16(wed)04:40:09
ID:ggNvEz790
>>8Nothing is a right, really. It's only considered so if enough people agree. In other words, rights are decided through intersubjective consensus.
10 :
Nameless@Passing through the lobby [CL] (*.movistar.cl)
: 22/06/16(wed)05:02:04
ID:YRCGcnEIR
Rights in the US are formalized by law under the bill of rights though. We don't live under a consensus based system.
11 :
Nameless@Passing through the lobby [BG] (78.90.*.*)
: 22/06/16(wed)06:16:39
ID:ggNvEz790
>>10The bill of rights would not have come into fruition if the majority of people living under the jurisdiction didn't agree to those rights.
That was a one time deal though.
It wasn't a one time deal. The Bill of Rights will stand as long as we protect it against the government or a corporation or any organization or individual that would infringe upon it. "The tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants" and all that. As for what
>>11 is saying, yes. The 10 amendments were written to serve as protection against the government after the creation of the Constitution and were written by the many of the same Founding Fathers who signed the Declaration of Independence. The citizens didn't vote in a referendum for the Constitution or the Bill of Rights, but their representatives did. The representatives were acting on behalf of their constituents so these documents are products of the general will.
14 :
Nameless@Passing through the lobby [US] (172.56.*.*)
: 24/07/16(sun)22:24:05
ID:emofoNPu0
15 :
Nameless@Passing through the lobby [US] (71.164.*.*)
: 26/07/16(tue)23:35:43
ID:uT44al9k0
You have the right to burger
20 KB
■ Este hilo se encuentra guardado en el archivo
weabot.py ver 0.11.0
Bienvenido a Internet BBS/IB